Lignite Imports in Brazil
Imports
Lignite imports into Brazil surged to 
tons in , picking up by % compared with figures. Over the period under review, imports continue to indicate a buoyant expansion. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2009 when imports increased by %. As a result, imports reached the peak of tons. From 2010 to , the growth of imports failed to regain momentum.
In value terms, lignite imports surged to $ in . Overall, imports saw buoyant growth. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2013 when imports increased by % against the previous year. Imports peaked in and are expected to retain growth in the near future.
tons in , picking up by % compared with figures. Over the period under review, imports continue to indicate a buoyant expansion. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2009 when imports increased by %. As a result, imports reached the peak of tons. From 2010 to , the growth of imports failed to regain momentum.In value terms, lignite imports surged to $
in . Overall, imports saw buoyant growth. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2013 when imports increased by % against the previous year. Imports peaked in and are expected to retain growth in the near future.Imports by Country
In , the United States ( tons) constituted the largest supplier of lignite to Brazil, accounting for a % share of total imports. Moreover, lignite imports from the United States exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, China ( tons), ninefold. The third position in this ranking was taken by Lebanon ( tons), with a % share.
From 2007 to, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume from the United States totaled +%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: China (+% per year) and Lebanon (+% per year).
In value terms, the United States ($) constituted the largest supplier of lignite to Brazil, comprising % of total imports. The second position in the ranking was taken by China ($), with a % share of total imports. It was followed by Lebanon, with a % share.
From 2007 to, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value from the United States stood at +%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: China (+% per year) and Lebanon (+% per year).
, the United States ( tons) constituted the largest supplier of lignite to Brazil, accounting for a % share of total imports. Moreover, lignite imports from the United States exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, China ( tons), ninefold. The third position in this ranking was taken by Lebanon ( tons), with a % share.From 2007 to
, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume from the United States totaled +%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: China (+% per year) and Lebanon (+% per year).In value terms, the United States ($
) constituted the largest supplier of lignite to Brazil, comprising % of total imports. The second position in the ranking was taken by China ($), with a % share of total imports. It was followed by Lebanon, with a % share.From 2007 to
, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value from the United States stood at +%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: China (+% per year) and Lebanon (+% per year).Import Prices by Country
The average lignite import price stood at $ per ton in , with a decrease of -% against the previous year. In general, the import price, however, continues to indicate a buoyant increase. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2013 when the average import price increased by % against the previous year. Over the period under review, average import prices reached the peak figure at $ per ton in , and then contracted in the following year.
There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major supplying countries. In, amid the top importers, the country with the highest price was the United States ($ per ton), while the price for Lebanon ($ per ton) was amongst the lowest.
From 2007 to, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Canada (+%), while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced more modest paces of growth.
per ton in , with a decrease of -% against the previous year. In general, the import price, however, continues to indicate a buoyant increase. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2013 when the average import price increased by % against the previous year. Over the period under review, average import prices reached the peak figure at $ per ton in , and then contracted in the following year.There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major supplying countries. In
, amid the top importers, the country with the highest price was the United States ($ per ton), while the price for Lebanon ($ per ton) was amongst the lowest.From 2007 to
, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Canada (+%), while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced more modest paces of growth.
Download XLSX
Download all the data in the form of a report